Hi Rasmus alternatives: an honest guide for ABA agencies (2026)
Hi Rasmus is a cloud-based clinical platform for ABA and interdisciplinary behavioral health practices, founded in 2019 in Denmark, with particular strength in clinical data collection, telehealth supervision, and parent training. It is deliberately clinical-first: rather than bundling billing and full practice management, it integrates with separate practice-management platforms such as Camber, Lumary, Aloha ABA, Therapy PMS, and Boost. Agencies typically start looking at alternatives when they want clinical documentation, scheduling, and billing in one system, or when they decide they would rather not manage the handoff between Hi Rasmus and a paired practice-management tool. This page covers what Hi Rasmus does well, the complaint themes that appear in its public Capterra reviews, and how to think about alternatives — including where Coralia fits and where it doesn't.
What Hi Rasmus does well
Deep, flexible clinical data collection: discrete trials, sets of targets, task analyses, interval, duration, rate, and ABC data, with the ability to mix and match target types within a single program — plus built-in program options for specific protocols including ESDM (Early Start Denver Model), SBT (Skill-Based Treatment), the Balance parent-training program, and SET (Sufficient Exemplar Training).
Strong telehealth and supervision tooling: a Supervise mode lets supervisors watch data collection progress in real time from anywhere, leave program-by-program observation notes, and asynchronously review and score videos uploaded by parents or direct staff — a natural fit for remote supervision and structured parent training.
RBT workforce training built in: Hi Rasmus states it designed the first-ever 40-hour RBT training course that is online, interactive, and behavioral-skills-training-based, with contributions from named experts such as Dr. Kelsey Ruppel and Dr. Michael Mueller (vendor claim).
An open integration ecosystem: rather than locking agencies into one back office, Hi Rasmus publishes integrations with practice-management platforms including Camber, Lumary, Aloha ABA, Therapy PMS, and Boost, syncing appointments and transferring finalized session notes and signatures between systems.
Well reviewed for usability: Hi Rasmus holds a 4.3/5 rating on Capterra across 3 reviews as of July 2026, with reviewers describing it as easy to learn, user-friendly for RBTs running sessions, and more flexible for programming targets than other systems they had used.
What reviewers consistently flag
The themes below are the recurring friction points in public reviews, each attributed to where it was observed.
Friction at the practice-management integration seam
Because Hi Rasmus pairs with separate practice-management systems, the handoff is where complaints cluster. On Capterra, two separate reviewers describe integration problems: one BCBA reported that "the interface with Aloha was less than ideal with frequent issues," and a founder/CEO who otherwise rated the product 5/5 noted that the integration with Lumary occasionally experienced technical issues. This is the closest thing to a recurring theme in the platform's small public review base.
Reported problems with prompt fading and task-analysis setup (individual account)
One individual Capterra reviewer, a BCBA, reported "frequent issues with programs not fading prompts" and said task analyses were difficult to set up. This is a single reviewer's account, not an established pattern, but it concerns core clinical programming mechanics, so it is worth testing during a trial or demo.
Graphing requires extra steps (individual account)
One individual Capterra reviewer, a CEO who rated the product 5/5 overall, noted that generating the desired graphs sometimes requires selecting multiple options, while acknowledging that all the needed features exist. An individual account, not a pattern — but relevant if fast report generation is central to your workflow.
Very small public review footprint with mid-range sub-scores
As of July 2026, Hi Rasmus has only 3 reviews on Capterra, and within that small sample the Customer Service and Value for Money sub-scores each average 3.0/5 (against 4.0 for Ease of Use and 4.3 overall). With so few data points, none of this is conclusive in either direction — it simply means buyers have less independent signal to rely on than with longer-established platforms, and should lean harder on their own trial.
How to evaluate an alternative
Whatever you choose — including staying — run the decision through these ten criteria:
- Size fit — match the platform's sweet spot to your clinician count. Enterprise breadth pays off at hundreds of clinicians; smaller agencies usually get faster time-to-value from simpler all-in-one tools.
- All-in-one vs add-ons — list which capabilities are native versus paid extras, and compute total cost with every add-on you actually need.
- Data migration — ask what your current system exports, who does the import, what happens when an import fails, and plan a parallel-run period.
- Contract terms — pricing model, contract length, auto-renewal windows, cancellation-notice deadlines, and price escalators. Get it in writing.
- AI capabilities — separate what ships today from roadmap promises, and confirm PHI handling by AI features is covered under the BAA.
- Compliance features — audit trails, role-based access, e-signatures, credential and supervision tracking, and EVV support where your state mandates it.
- Billing depth — clearinghouse integration, ERA posting, denial workflows, and authorization-unit tracking against payer caps.
- Point-of-care usability — how fast a technician can collect data and finish a note on a phone. This drives daily adoption more than any back-office feature.
- Support and onboarding — structured training, a named implementation contact, and reference checks with agencies your size.
- Trial with real workflows — run your actual intake → session → note → claim flow end to end before committing.
The landscape of alternatives
| Platform | Positioning | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Coralia | AI-first all-in-one platform whose differentiator is autonomous compliance: Sentinel audits every day's session notes and a per-agency AI copilot works across scheduling, billing, and operations. | Small and mid-size agencies that want documentation audit-readiness built in, not bolted on. |
| CentralReach | The category's market leader with the broadest all-in-one enterprise suite: clinical data collection, scheduling, billing and claims, payroll, HR, analytics, and a learning/CEU platform in one ecosystem. | Large multi-site, multi-state organizations with complex billing hierarchies and internal admin teams. |
| ABA Matrix | Highly rated all-in-one (4.9/5 on Capterra as of July 2026) built for small ABA providers — scheduling, assessments, data collection, one-click billing, and payroll tied to schedules. | Small practices and startups that want everything connected out of the box. |
| Theralytics | Practice management plus data collection, BCBA-founded, SOC 2 Type II and ONC-certified, with transparent published pricing and no long-term contracts. | Cost-conscious small and mid-size practices that want predictable pricing. |
| AlohaABA | Practice-administration hub for scheduling, authorizations, billing, payroll, and receivables; pairs with data-collection partners via integrations. | Agencies whose main pain is admin and billing operations. |
| Motivity | Clinically driven platform with deeply flexible data collection and program building; practice-management features are newer additions. | Clinical-quality-first teams that want measurement flexibility. |
| RethinkBH | Connected clinical and practice management for pediatric behavioral health with strong built-in caregiver training content. | Mid-size organizations serving broader developmental populations. |
| Artemis ABA | Salesforce-based platform with AI-assisted scheduling and heavy revenue-cycle automation: eligibility checks, claim scrubbing, AR analytics. | Billing-heavy mid-size and larger organizations comfortable on Salesforce. |
| Raven Health | Modern, mobile-first data collection with scheduling, billing, and reporting, fully functional on iOS and Android. | Clinics prioritizing simple, reliable point-of-care mobile capture. |
| Noteable | Behavioral-health EHR spanning ABA plus mental health (4.7/5 across ~85 Capterra reviews as of July 2026), with managed billing services available. | Multi-disciplinary organizations adding mental-health services alongside ABA. |
| Office Puzzle | Flat-rate, all-inclusive ABA practice management from a Florida-based, founder-led company — $19.99 per user per month covers scheduling, documentation, data collection, billing, and payroll, with sessions tied to authorizations. | Small home- and community-based ABA agencies that want predictable per-user pricing, everything included, and hands-on onboarding without enterprise complexity. |
| Catalyst | Veteran ABA data-collection specialist (DataFinch, 2010), now sold as Ensora Data Collection within Ensora Health's ABA line; deep discrete-trial and skill-acquisition tooling with automatic graphing, typically paired with a separate practice-management and billing system. | Agencies that want deep, highly customizable clinical data collection with published reliability evidence and are comfortable running it alongside a separate practice-management system. |
| WebABA | WebABA (now Ensora ABA Suite) is the ABA practice-management arm of Ensora Health (formerly Therapy Brands): an established scheduling, billing, and authorization platform with optional managed billing and a companion data-collection product, rated 3.8/5 on Capterra (87 reviews, as of July 2026). | Agencies that want an ABA-specific system from a large, established vendor and value optional outsourced revenue cycle management. |
Where Coralia honestly fits
If your agency's center of gravity is telehealth supervision, protocol-specific clinical programming (ESDM, SBT, Balance), or structured parent training — and you already have a practice-management system you like — Hi Rasmus is a genuinely strong choice and may serve you better than switching. Coralia takes the opposite architectural bet: instead of pairing a clinical platform with a separate back office, it is built for small and mid-size ABA agencies as one system, so there is no handoff between separate clinical and practice-management systems to manage. On top of that, Coralia runs Sentinel, an autonomous auditor that reviews every day's session notes against a clinical documentation catalog and routes corrections for human approval, plus a per-agency AI copilot across scheduling, billing, and operations. You can judge the difference yourself in Coralia's open live demo at /demo — no sales call required.
Frequently asked questions
Should agencies avoid Hi Rasmus?
No. Hi Rasmus holds a 4.3/5 rating on Capterra (3 reviews, as of July 2026), and reviewers describe it as easy to learn and unusually flexible for clinical programming — one agency founder praised its ease of use for RBTs running sessions and said it gives practitioners more flexibility than other systems he had seen. The complaints that do appear in its Capterra reviews mostly sit at the seam between Hi Rasmus and the separate practice-management systems it pairs with, which is less a defect than a consequence of its deliberate design: it is a clinical-first platform, not an all-in-one back office. If your agency wants best-of-breed clinical data collection and telehealth supervision and is comfortable running billing in a connected system like Aloha ABA or Lumary, Hi Rasmus is a credible, well-regarded choice.
What should a small ABA agency use instead of Hi Rasmus?
It depends on what is driving the switch. If you want clinical work, scheduling, and billing operations in one system built for a small or mid-size agency, Coralia is designed for exactly that, and you can open its live demo at /demo without a sales call. If you want an established all-in-one suite and can absorb enterprise-grade complexity, CentralReach is among the most widely deployed options. Rethink Behavioral Health offers combined clinical and practice-management tooling with a large curriculum library, and Motivity is a strong clinical-first data-collection alternative if you like the clinical-first model Hi Rasmus uses but want to compare implementations. Shortlist two or three, and run your own real-world scenarios in each before deciding.
How hard is it to migrate off Hi Rasmus?
It is a manageable project, and often a two-part one: because Hi Rasmus typically runs alongside a separate practice-management system, your clinical data (programs, targets, graphs, session notes) and your operational data (clients, authorizations, claims) may live in two places and migrate on separate tracks. Practical steps: export session notes, graphs, and program data before your contract ends; rebuild active programs and mastery criteria in the new system rather than trying to force-import them; keep read-only access or complete exports of historical records to satisfy documentation-retention requirements; and run the old and new systems in parallel for a few weeks so data collection never has a gap. Planning the cutover around an authorization cycle usually makes for the smoothest transition.
CentralReach, ABA Matrix, Theralytics, AlohaABA, Motivity, RethinkBH, Artemis ABA, Raven Health, Noteable, Office Puzzle, Catalyst, WebABA, Hi Rasmusare trademarks of their respective owners, used here only to identify the products. Coralia is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of them. Review figures are as of July 2026 and drift over time; verify current ratings and pricing on each vendor's site. This page is educational, not purchasing or legal advice.